To justify the above thesis, let us go back to the times immediately preceding the emergence of the Theory of Relativity. The phenomena described by TR may be the result of other, simpler phenomena, which in turn result from a different structure of reality than the one we observe and imagine from our direct observations. In my opinion, this is precisely the case with the Theory of Relativity. It turns out that in some cases the description should be supplemented by a model of a new structure of reality, in which processes take place, which we are not able to observe and which indirectly manifest themselves in our reality in the form of observable physical phenomena. This approach usually works well, but sometimes you need to look at phenomena from a greater distance and with more imagination. To put it bluntly, is it even possible to find any fault there? I wanted to demonstrate that, despite its unquestionable success, the Theory of Relativity may have, in its underlying structure, errors typical of new theories built with the assumption that it is sufficient to classify observed physical phenomena and then describe them mathematically. It entails criticizing a theory put forth by an undisputed authority, a theory which has repeatedly been tested experimentally, which has been the basis of numerous inventions, from nuclear reactors to the GPS systems the theory that predicted the existence of black holes, explained the phenomenon of gravity, and achieved many other spectacular successes. Introduction – A Bit of History Any attempt to challenge Einstein's Theory of Relativity is practically a scientific suicide. The new definition of time- and space dimensions also allows to define the proper time of particles directly as the number of de Broglie’s wave periods for both relativistic physics and Quantum Mechanics.ġ. In this work, using the trivial example of waves on the surface of water, I derive relativistic relationships and give an unambiguous and precise interpretation of basic concepts like time, space, relativity of motion, and simultaneity of events. Including the wave nature of matter in the basic assumptions of the model of reality allows to greatly simplify the model, expand its capabilities compared to the model currently in force, and remove many problems specific to the Theory of Relativity. In 1905, Einstein did not have all the information necessary to construct the proper model of relativity therefore, by publishing the Theory of Relativity without knowledge of the wave structure of matter, he made a kind of a false start, which resulted in the excessive complexity and unintuitive nature of the Theory of Relativity. According to the thesis presented here, the correct model of reality should be based on two major discoveries of the 20th century: Einstein's discovery that reality is four-dimensional (1905) and de Broglie's wave structure of matter (1924).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |